Boundary myths

Jon Maynard Boundaries Ltd, Boundary Demarcation and Disputes, Rights of Way, Expert Witness, Chartered Land Surveyor

BOUNDARY
PROBLEMS

An Internet resource provided free since February 2000 by Jon Maynard Boundaries Ltd
This web site does not collect personal data from its readers.

Boundary Myths Busted

  You are here:    Boundary Problems | Boundary Myths Busted
Myth 1 Land Registry is responsible for deciding where property boundaries are.
Myth 2 Ordnance Survey maps show property boundaries.
Myth 3 Land Registry's title plans show you exactly where the boundary is.
Myth 4 Ordnance Survey maps are accurate: they must be because they are government-backed.
Myth 5 The position of a boundary can be ascertained by scaling from the title plan its distance from other nearby objects that appear on the title plan.
Myth 6 Land Registry is the national authority on boundaries.
Myth 7 When you and your neighbour are disputing the boundary, Land Registry can Determine the Exact Line of the Boundary for you.
Myth 8 Every homeowner is responsible for the fence on the left hand side of his land.
Myth 9 Every homeowner is responsible for those of the fences surrounding his garden that have the good-looking,side facing the neighbour.
Myth 10 You can claim ownership of part of your neighbour's open-plan front garden by mowing the grass that grows on the land you are trying to claim.
Myth 11 You can park anywhere upon your own land, even if you are parking on a part of your land that is burdened by a private right of way over which one or more of your neighbours is entitled to drive or to walk.
Myth 12 If you access your land via a private right of way, you can park your car on that private right of way.
Myth 13 "I own the boundary."
Myth 14 "I bought my house 'sight as seen' and what I saw was ...."
Myth 15 "My conveyancing solicitor checked my boundaries when I bought the house."
Myth 16 "What it says in my conveyance deed and on my conveyance plan must be true, because the conveyance and its plan is a legal document!"
Myth 17 "A boundary is forever!"
Myth 18 "The way to avoid a boundary dispute is to get a land surveyor to set out the boundary using MapServe® Freehold Boundaries!"
Myth 19 "The general boundary on my title plan allows me to put my boundary where I want to put it!"
Myth 20 "Ordnance Survey shows each side of a thick hedge with a solid line."
Myth 21 "Hedges on OS maps are shown as a single line that is invariably drawn on the farthest side from the owner of the hedge. Thus, the title plans, which are based on OS maps, confirm which property owns the hedge."

 

Very few landowners are privileged to have had any sort of education in land or property law. Good information about property ownership, and particularly boundaries, has been difficult for landowners to find. Unsurprisingly, there has grown up a culture of myths surrounding boundaries. What follows is an explanation of why each of these myths is untrue.

 

 
Myth 1
Land Registry is responsible for deciding where property boundaries are.

Get real

That is rather like saying that DVLA - who compile registers of motor vehicles and whose V5C document lists, among other things, the colour of your car - was responsible for deciding the colour of the car that you drive.

The truth

Land Registry is nothing more than a technical library whose contents relate to land ownership. The person to "first register" the title to a parcel of land is responsible for supplying Land Registry with documents that provide a description of the boundaries. Land Registry is responsible for interpreting that boundary description onto a map base that is surveyed and drawn to a consistent standard across the whole of England and Wales. Land Registry is a secondary source for information about your land, and the boundaries were decided upon before Land Registry had any involvement.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 2
Ordnance Survey maps show property boundaries.

Get real

Boundaries are invisible. The surveyors employed by Ordnance Survey are trained in surveying those things that they can see; they are not trained in boundary determination.

The truth

Ordnance Survey maps are prevented in law from showing property boundaries, or as section 12 of the Ordnance Survey Act 1841 puts it:
" ... This present Act ... shall not ... affect, any Boundary or Boundaries of ... any Land or Property ... but that all Right and Title of any Owner shall remain to all Intents and Purposes in like State and Condition as if this Act had not been passed".

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 3
Land Registry's title plans show you exactly where the boundary is.

Get real

Title plans show you only the general position of the boundary.

The truth

In accordance with section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002, Land Registry's title plans come with the warning:
"This title plan shows the general position, not the exact line, of the boundaries. It may be subject to distortions in scale. Measurements scaled from this plan may not match measurements between the same points on the ground."

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 4
Ordnance Survey maps are accurate: they must be because they are government-backed.

Get real

The line on a printed and published Ordnance Survey map is 0.2 mm wide on the paper, which is to say that it is the equivalent of 25 cm (10 in) wide on the ground if the map is at 1:1250 scale, or 50 cm (20 in) wide on the ground if the map is at 1:2500 scale.

The truth

Beyond the thickness of the line, the position of the centre of the line on the map is:

  • at best anything up to 400 mm (16 in) on 1:1250 scale maps and up to 1 metre (3 ft 4 in) on 1:2500 scale maps, and
  • generally anything up to 1 metre (3 ft 4 in) on 1:1250 scale maps and up to 2 metre (6 ft 8 in) on 1:2500 scale maps, and
  • exceptionally more than 2 metre (6 ft 7 in) on 1:1250 scale maps and more than 2.5 metre (8 ft 2 in) on 1:2500 scale maps,
away from the true ground position of the ground feature that is represented by that line.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 5
The position of a boundary can be ascertained by scaling from the title plan its distance from other nearby objects that appear on the title plan.

Get real

That approach is treating as a blueprint both the title plan and the Ordnance Survey map on which the title plan is based.

The truth

A blueprint is used in mechanical engineering and other disciplines for recording a design for something that has yet to be built.

Ordnance Survey does not design the landscape but measures to, and draws maps that show, physical features that already exist on the ground. Ordnance Survey's maps are not, and should not be mistaken for, blueprints.

Land Registry is only a secondary source for, not a designer of, boundaries, see Myth 1. Ordnance Survey has no part to play, see Myth 2, in deciding where property boundaries will be and is prohibited in law from investigating property boundaries and from showing them on its maps.

Moreover, the Ordnance Survey map has accuracy limitations that are explained at Myth 4. Further information on the difficulties in interpreting the Ordnance Survey maps can be found on the Using Ordnance Survey maps page of this web site.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 6
Land Registry is the national authority on property boundaries.

Get real

How can they be the authority on boundaries when they deal with only the general positions of boundaries?

The truth

Land Registry is required to maintain a register of every parcel of land the title to which has been registered. Section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002 states:

"(1) The boundary of a registered estate as shown for the purposes of the register is a general boundary, unless shown as determined under this section."

The definition given at Section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002 is no more enlightening:

"(2) A general boundary does not determine the exact line of the boundary."

Land Registry's Practice Guide 40, supplement 5: title plan tells us:

"The purpose of the title plan is to support the property description in the register by providing a graphic representation and identifying the general extent of the land in a registered title." Also:

"All title plans show general boundaries unless the line of boundary is shown as having been determined under section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002."

Land Registry is not the originator of information concerning property boundaries;
Land Registry is a secondary source of information concerning property boundaries;
Land Registry is not, and cannot be, the national authority on property boundaries.


If the owners of adjoining lands find themselves in dispute as to the exact position of the common boundary of their respective lands, then they have to accept that there is no national authority to whom they can turn. To resolve their dispute they must agree to use one of the following processes:

a) amicably negotiate with each other the exact line of their common boundary for the purpose of clarifying the boundary shown on their respective title plans or preferably on the pre-registration title deeds (if such still exist) for their respective properties;
or

b) use an Alternative Dispute Resolution method, such as:
- appoint an Adjudicator or an Arbitrator to consider the evidence and determine the position of the boundary;
- appoint an Expert to determine the position of the boundary;
- appoint a Mediator to oversee a negotiation between the two adjoining landowners;
or

c) resort to litigation through the Land Registration Division of the Property Chamber (First Tier Tribunal).

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 7
When you and your neighbour are disputing the boundary, Land Registry can Determine the Exact Line of the Boundary for you.

Get real

Land Registry does not get involved in Boundary disputes. Land Registry deals only in the general positions of boundaries and lacks the expertise to establish the true position of the boundary.

The truth

Land Registry is required under section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002 to record only the general positions of the boundaries of any parcel of land. Land Registry is required under section 5 of the Land Registration Rules 2003 to use the Ordnance Survey map as the basis of its title plans. And section 12 of the Ordnance Survey Act 1841 holds that "all Right and Title of any Owner shall remain to all Intents and Purposes in like State and Condition as if this Act had not been passed . . .", i.e. the Ordnance Survey map has no effect on the boundaries of private land. Thus, Land Registry does not have the ability to establish the exact line of any boundary.

Anyone wishing to record the exact line of a boundary that has been agreed between themselves and the neighbouring landowner can do so by submitting to Land Registry the necessary plan (made by a land surveyor appointed jointly by the affected landowners) together with a Form DB (obtainable from Land Registry).

Initially that form DB was titled "Application to Determine the Exact line of a Boundary". The title was misleading as it gave the impression that the form's purpose was to commission Land Registry to decide where the exact line of the boundary was to be found. Land Registry later re-titled form DB as "Exact line of boundary: registration".

In spite of this, many people still, erroneously, think that Land Registry will, upon receipt of a Form DB, come and decide for you exactly where your boundary is.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 8
Every homeowner is responsible for the fence on the left hand side of his land when the land is viewed from the street.

This is also sometimes stated as:
Every homeowner is responsible for the fence on the right hand side of his land when the land is viewed from the street.

Get real

Sadly, this myth results from wishful thinking.

The truth

There is no law or regulation that prescribes this.

It is for the seller of a parcel of land to set out in the conveyance deed (for unregistered land) or the transfer deed (for registered land) the details of those boundaries for which the buyer will assume the responsibility to maintain, repair and replace the boundary markers. That goes for the rear boundaries as well as the flank boundaries. All too often, the said deed is silent as to which boundaries are to be maintained. In such cases, Land Registry is unable to record for which boundaries the registered proprietor is responsible, and it becomes necessary for the adjoining homeowners to try to work out, or to negotiate with each other, which boundaries they are each responsible for.

It is normal practice for the property owner to be responsible for marking the boundary along his or her road frontge

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 9
Every homeowner is responsible for those of the fences surrounding his garden that have the good, or good-looking, side facing the neighbour.

Get real

Again, this myth results from wishful thinking.

The truth

There is no law or regulation that prescribes this. There is only the custom that this is practised on the fence that runs along a homeowner's road frontage.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 10
You can claim ownership of part of your neighbour's open-plan front garden by mowing the grass that grows on the land you are trying to claim.

Get real

Again, this myth results from wishful thinking.

The truth

The myth is based on a failure to understand the principle of "adverse possession". To be able to claim adverse possession over a strip of land that adjoins your own you must demonstrate "exclusive enjoyment", which involves enclosing (fencing-off) the claimed land for a period of at least 10 years so as to prevent both the rightful owner and the general public from using the land. As the claimed land is part of an open-plan front garden it is not possible to fence it, and therefore not possible to claim adverse possession.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 11
You can park anywhere upon your own land, even if you are parking on a part of your land that is burdened by a private right of way over which one or more of your neighbours is entitled to drive or to walk.

Get real

Park your car somewhere else where it doesn't obstruct your neighbours' cars.

The truth

If the right of way is narrow enough to be impassable (when your car is parked on it) to others who enjoy the use of that right of way, then you will be obstructing their right of way and they can seek a court order requiring you not to park on it.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 12
If you access your land via a private right of way, you can park your car on that private right of way.

Get real

Park your car somewhere on your own land where it cannot obstruct passage by others along the right of way.

The truth

If the right of way is narrow enough to be impassable to others when your car is parked on it, then you will be obstructing their right of way and they can seek a court order requiring you not to park on it.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 13
"I own the boundary."

Get real

There are a number of boundaries around your property.
Each part of your boundaries that abuts only one other property is known as the common boundary with that other property.
The common boundary is an imaginary line that has no thickness - so there is nothing to own!
The common boundary is as much your neighbour's boundary as it is your boundary.

The truth

What you were trying to say is, "My title deeds include a covenant obliging me to maintain, repair, and if necessary replace whatever physical feature it is that marks this particular common boundary."

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 14
"I bought my house 'sight as seen' and what I saw was ...."

Examples of what was seen include;
a) the boundary at (some stated distance) from the side of next door's house;
b) a footpath that was clearly inside the boundary of the house that I have bought;
c) a parking space belonging to the house in the private road that runs past the house.

Get real

No-one told you, the purchaser, any of those things. You just saw something and misinterpreted what you saw. In addition, you don't have any understanding of what 'sight as seen' means.

The truth

Sadly, and in spite of the fact that your house is most likely your most expensive purchase, caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) still applies to the purchase of real estate. Vendors (or transferors, if the title to the land being sold has been registered) do not offer a property 'sight as seen': the whole conveyancing process assumes that caveat emptor applies

Both caveat emptor and 'sight as seen' imply that the purchaser is given the opportunity to inspect the property or the goods on offer for the purpose of identifying any defects and choosing whether to renegotiate, or to call off, the deal. If the deal goes ahead then any unresolved defects become the responsibility of the new owner, even if the new owner was not told about them prior to purchase and did not discover them prior to purchase.

In house-buying terms, common defects include a leaking roof, a broken down central heating boiler, the worn out decor. What house buyers tend to forget is that the boundaries can be defects, so too can easements (footpaths, parking spaces), and that if those defects are not corrected before purchase then these items become the new owner's responsibility, and can be very costly to correct. Further, because boundaries and easements are not unique to the property but affect the adjoining properties, resolution of these defects requires negotiation with (in preference to conflict with) the neighbouring landowners.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 15
"My conveyancing solicitor checked my boundaries when I bought the house."

Get real

Where on your solicitor's invoice does it say that the solicitor changed out of an office suit and into gardening clothes, loaded a land surveying kit into the car, spent hours measuring the garden, followed by hours of office time drawing a topographic survey plan and analysing the old title deeds against that survey plan?

The truth

Your conveyancing solicitor is not a boundaries expert.

Your solicitor would have made checks to ensure that the vendor was not trying to sell you more land than the vendor owned, and would have done this by comparing old conveyance deeds, without taking the trouble to visit and inspect the land - and its boundaries - that you were in the process of buying.

These days it is quite likely that your solicitor will give you a copy of the title plan and instruct you to go and check the boundaries against the title plan for yourself. And that is definitely not a case of your solicitor checking the boundaries for you.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 16
"What it says in my conveyance deed and on my conveyance plan must be true, because the conveyance and its plan is a legal document!"

Get real

So why, in its January 2015 paper " Boundary Disputes, A Scoping Study", Did the Ministry of Justice write:
"The underlying problem … [is] that boundaries generally are not and have never been precisely delineated in the way that occurs within some other types of [i.e. foreign] land ownership systems.

The truth

Conveyancing solicitors are undeniably the authors of conveyance deeds. This means that conveyancing solicitors, even if they did not create the boundary descriptions that go into the conveyance deeds that they write, are responsible for the boundary descriptions that go into those deeds. so, it is the conveyancing profession that must be held responsible for the imprecise delineations referred to by the Ministry of Justice.

Yet, conveyancing solicitors are not boundaries experts.

Hence, the whole system of describing boundaries for the purposes of buying and selling land is deeply flawed.

Examples of a few of these flawed boundary descriptions may be found at:

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 17
"A boundary is forever! It can never be moved from the position in which it was created."

Get real

There is no statute law in England & Wales that requires that a boundary should forever remain in the same position as was assigned to it when the boundary was first created.

The truth

In simple terms, a boundary-marking feature may change its position over time. This may or may not mean that the boundary moves with the feature that formerly marked it. Think of a river whose centre-line marks a boundary, and whose course changes over time. Think, too, of the wooden fence that rots away and perhaps disappears completely; or perhaps it is replaced with a new fence that stands in a position that is slightly different from the position in which its predecessor had stood.

Because there is little statute law relating to boundaries, the courts have, over time, developed a body of legal presumptions and legal precedents.

When a boundary dispute goes to trial in a court or tribunal, the judge will seek answers to the following questions:

  • Which is the "operative conveyance", and if that is not available, then which is the oldest conveyance that is available, and where on the ground would we find the boundary that is described therein?
     
  • Did either of the parties to that conveyance carry out some action that was either agreed by, or at least was uncontested by, the other party: for example, was the purchaser covenanted to erect a fence in a certain position but failed to position it correctly?
     
  • Did either the current owner or one of the predecessors-in-title to the current owner agree the position of the boundary with the adjoining owner or a predecessor-in-title to the current adjonining landowner?
     
  • Have the requirements been met for the judge to make a decision that the boundary has been moved through the operation of adverse possession?
     
  • Have the requirements been met for the judge to make a decision, on the basis of the legal principle of "proprietary estoppel" that the boundary has been moved?

With so many reasons as to why a boundary might move away from its original position, it is unwise to claim that a boundary cannot move away from its original position.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 18
"The way to avoid a boundary dispute is to get a land surveyor to set out the boundary using MapServe® Freehold Boundaries!"

Get real

WOW !   If only that were true!

WHOA !   Haven't you yet read myths 1 to 6?

WAIT A MINUTE !   

  • If you do this then I can guarantee that you will really, truly, deeply annoy your next door neighbour.
     
  • You will make your situation 100 times worse than it is already.
     
  • You are heading straight for what the Ministry of Justice calls an "unduly bitter, expensive and time-consuming boundary dispute".
     
  • You are going to hell in a handcart. 

The truth

MapServe® describes Freehold Boundaries as "Land Registry based freehold ownership boundaries in CAD format".

CAD format simply means that the product is digital data that can be used in a computer aided drawing application. So that's good.

But what are "freehold ownership boundaries"?

  • The implication is that they are the red edging that you find on a title plan.
     
  • The fact is that they are not from that dataset, but from a different dataset that puts the red lines that you see on Land Registry's online index map of registered titles, which dataset is less accurate than the red edging on the title plans.
     
  • The red edging on the title plan shows only the general position of the boundary, according to section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002: it does not show the exact line of the boundary.
     
  • The Ordnance Survey map on which title plans are based and to which "Freehold Boundaries" are referenced is governed by section 12 of the Ordnance Survey Act 1841 that states that OS maps do not "ascertain, define, alter, enlarge, increase or decrease, nor in any way to affect, any Boundary or Boundaries of .... any Land or Property ... nor affect the Title of any such Owner or Owners . . . but that all Right and Title of any Owner ... shall remain to all Intents and Purposes in like State and Condition as if this Act had not been passed".
     

Setting out and staking "Freehold Boundaries" is thus dependent on using Ordnance Survey map coordinates, and those coordinates are fraught with misleading cartographic subtleties:

  • The Ordnance Survey maps have an accuracy in the range of ±0.4m to ±1.0m or more in urban areas and in the range of ±0.9m to ±3.0m or more in rural areas.
     
  • When faced with parallel features that are too close together for both to be shown, e.g. a hedge standing beside a fence, the Ordnance Survey map will omit one of those two features.
     
  • When one linear feature, e.g. a fence, passes too close beside a second and parallel feature, e.g. the flank wall of a house, the Ordnance Survey map will re-align one of those features to make it collinear with the other feature.
     
  • In other words, what you see on an Ordnance Survey map is not necessarily shown in its true ground position.
     

Given the above limitations, setting out a boundary using Ordnance Survey mapping, perhaps guided by one of: a) a title plan; b)Land Registry Map Search polygons; c) MapServe® Freehold Boundaries!"; is completely the wrong way to attempt to resolve a boundary dispute.

PS. What did I mean by "going to hell in a handcart"? I mean that you are starting with good intentions but the route your are following will inevitably result in everything going very badly wrong.

What you should do if your surveyor suggests "setting out" the boundary.

Tell your land (or geomtics or geospatial) surveyor that he or she has displayed a lack of knowledge about boundaries and is unsuitable for the work that you need them for. And in a spirit of helpfulness, show them this Myth 18 to point out where they have gone wrong. Then go to Find a surveyor to look for a surveyor who does understand boundaries.

What you should do if your neighbour's surveyor has "set out" and marked, with pegs or stakes, the boundary.

Download a copy of this Myth 18, then go to http://boundary-problems.co.uk/ to download a copy of JMB31 "Finding your way through the mire of a boundary dispute". Show your neighbour Myth 18 and commiserate with them for having wasted their money. Give them a copy of JMB31 and suggest that they co-operate with you in trying to solve the boundary dispute in order to avoid the undue expense of litigation.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 19
"The general boundary on my title plan allows me to put my boundary where I want to put it!"

Get real

That is just ridiculous, and also quite illogical.

If you can put your boundary (watch your language, you mean "put your fence") where you want to, then the same reasoning allows your neighbour to put his/her/their fence just where he/she/they wants to put it. And I wouldn't mind betting that you would be mighty offended if your neighbour had thought of doing it to you before you thought of doing it to him/her/them.

The truth

Your title plan shows only the general boundary because Land Registry has not been told, by the conveyancing solicitor applying to register his client's land, exactly where the boundary is to be found: and section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002 absolves Land Registry from a need to know exactly where the boundary is.

That does not mean that you can just make up the exact position of the boundary for yourself.

Land Registry may - and it may not - have a copy of a pre-registration title deed, which deed may have a description, admittedly this is likely an ambiguous description, of the boundaries of your property. Or it may - or may not - have a copy of a pre-registration title deed relating to your neighbour's land, describing, perhaps also ambiguously, the boundary dividing their land from yours.

Such deeds as Land Registry has copied and filed are offered for sale, to anyone who wishes to buy them, as "official copies"

If your neighbour purchases an "official copy" of such deeds as Land Registry can offer, then you will find yourself in difficulty. If you try to ignore that difficulty then you are risking pushing you and your neighbour into what the Ministry of Justice calls an "unduly bitter, expensive and time-consuming boundary dispute".

Even though Land Registry cannot tell you exactly where your boundary is, there are plenty of methods employed by the courts to work out exactly where the boundary is. Try reading How to work out where the boundary is, and encourage your neighbour to read it as well. Then you may be able to avoid litigation by agreeing with each other exactly where the boundary is and registering that boundary agreement with Land Registry.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 20
"Ordnance Survey shows each side of a thick hedge with a solid line."

Get real

Just go and ask Ordnance Survey how they depict hedges on their large scales maps. They never use a pair of parallel lines as this myth suggests!

The truth

Ordnance Survey maps only ever show a hedge with a single line, which single line shows the root-line (or centre, if you prefer) of the hedge. It doesn't matter how thick the hedge is allowed to grow, it is shown by a single line. It doesn't matter if it is a "double hedge", which is the manner in which a great many beech hedges are planted: there are two rows of beech plants, the plants in the back row being placed to plug the gaps between the plants in the front row. Even these "double hedges" are shown by a single line, presumably representing the centre of the gap between the two rows.

This myth has been brought to mind by a boundary dispute that went to litigation: I am bringing you this information on a "no names, no pack drill" basis (if you are familar with the military reference) or an "I never reveal my sources" basis (if you prefer the journalistic reference). Some details of the case are as follows.

The case involved two houses in different streets whose rear gardens backed onto each other. One property had a T-mark against the line representing some feature at the very end of its rear garden. The other property had a wide hedge at the back of its rear garden and standing clear of the fence that divided the two properties. There were two lines on the map that scaled at about six feet apart.

The owner of the first property made the claim that the two lines represented the opposite sides of the thick hedge and that the boundary was thus along the edge of the hedge that faced the neighbour's house. This was a ridiculous claim to make, given that it is based upon a complete misunderstanding of what is shown, and of how it is shown, on Ordnance Survey maps.

 

    Return to Top of Page

 

 
Myth 21
"Hedges on OS maps are shown as a single line that is invariably drawn on the farthest side from the owner of the hedge. Thus, the title plans, which are based on OS maps, confirm which property owns the hedge."

Get real

That is just rubbish. It misrepresents what is shown on Ordnance Survey maps, and it misrepresents what Land Registry shows on its title plans.

Background

This myth also arises from a boundary dispute that went to litigation: I am again bringing you this information on a "no names, no pack drill" basis (if you are familar with the military reference) or an "I never reveal my sources" basis (if you prefer the journalistic reference).

The truth

a. As Myth 20 explained, Ordnance Survey never surveys the "edges" of a hedge, it only ever surveys the root lines.

b. As Myth 2 explained, under section 12 of the Ordnance Survey Act 1841, Ordnance Survey is prevented from showing property boundaries on its maps.

c. Land Registry's' title plans are indeed based upon Ordnance Survey maps in accordance with section 5 of The Land Registration Rules 2003. Therefore, title plans can be no more accurate than the Ordnance Survey maps on which they are based.

d. Moreover, Land Registry is required by Section 60 of the Land Registration Act 2002 to show only the general position of the boundary, which general position does not determine the exact line of the boundary. Hence, the title plan doesn't even tell you what physical feature carries the boundary.

e. Finally, you need T-marks to tell you who is responsible for maintaining the boundary-marking feature. T-marks are almost never seen on title plans. They are traditionally found on conveyance plans and on transfer plans, but this leads to two further problems. One problem is that Land Registry does not always have avaialable an "official copy" of such a deed plan. The second problem is that such deed plans are often silent on the question of who is responsible for maintaining the boundary-marking feature.

The myth is completely without foundation.

 

    Return to Top of Page